The wealth gap and the Millionaires Tax

By | February 21, 2012 |

A UT story this morning on the Millionaires Tax proposal to fund California schools referred to “what some see as a wealth gap.”

That’s like saying “some see” the Grand Canyon as steep terrain.

The huge divide between the super-wealthy and the rest of us is a matter of arithmetic, not perception.

  • The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development reported in December that the gap between the rich and the poor has hit its highest level in more than 30 years, and the US has the fourth-highest inequality level, after Chile, Mexico and Turkey.
  • The top 1% wealthiest households now own almost 40% of our national wealth, while the median household income dropped by $10,000 over 25 years, the Economic Policy Institute reports.
  • And in San Diego, Census data analyzed by CPI shows that the poverty rate rose to almost 15% in 2010, while the top 20% of households take almost half of all income in the region.

Those are hard facts.

The proposed Millionaires Tax is sensible and fair, and not just because of the injustice in the rampant wealth inequity.

People who earn more than $1,000,000 a year can easily afford to chip in a small fraction to preserve our schools. After all, they could not have achieved that wealth without an educated workforce – from attorneys and accountants to engineers and technicians. It’s time to pay it forward.

The Millionaires Tax would add a 3% tax only on income above the first $1 million, and an additional 2% on income over $2 million.

A coalition called Restoring California kicked off the signature drive last week to put the Millionaires Tax on the November ballot. It would restore up to $9 billion a year that has been cut from education, elder care, public safety and infrastructure.

To learn more and sign up to help, visit www.millionairestaxca.com.

CPI’s Corinne Wilson Shares Sobering Foreclosure Facts

By | Published in San Diego Reader | February 21, 2012 |

For the February meeting of A Better San Diego’s breakfast forum, Corinne Wilson joined Dave Lagstein of ACCE to share facts aout the devastating impact of the Foreclosure Crisis.

Read the news article about the meeting here.

Issues: | Campaigns: |

Thank You & Happy New Year!

By | January 2, 2012 |

On behalf of the CPI team, I want to wish you a very happy and fruitful new year! We’re so grateful to everyone who donated to CPI in 2011. Your generous support makes our work for economic justice and shared prosperity possible!As we enter 2012, economic inequality is increasingly prominent in the public discourse.  I’m excited about the opportunities locally, as well as nationally, to transform our society for the better.Thanks again for your commitment to social change in San Diego!Sincerely,Clare Crawford
Executive Director

P.S. It’s never too early to make a 2012 tax-deductible donation to support our work for a fair economy. Thanks!

Thank you to all CPI donors!

“I donated to CPI because I believe in investing locally with organizations that are making changes for the better in our city. I am glad that we have CPI to fight for justice, equality, and the common good in San Diego.”
Rebecca Rojas, North Park resident

“I strongly support fair wages and the importance of housing for wellness — issues which CPI addresses through advocacy, policy initiatives and research.”
Dr. Ruth Covell, ret. Associate Dean & Professor, UCSD School of Medicine

“CPI provides citizens, policymakers and the media with data and analysis on issues like healthcare, poverty, employment and good government. With big corporations and the super-rich dominating the media and politics, we need watchdogs like CPI.”
Jennifer C. Douglas, co-producer of 2012 film “Save KLSD: Media Consolidation & Local Radio”

Study Finds Prop. S Labor Agreement Good for Taxpayers, Local Jobs

By | December 14, 2011 |

Friday, December 9, 2011

Study Finds Prop. S Labor Agreement Good for Taxpayers, Local Jobs

An independent study commissioned by the San Diego Unified School District has shown that the $2.1 billion construction bond’s Project Stabilization Agreement (PSA) has produced the benefits promised without impact on cost or quality of the construction. 
The study, completed by consultant Rea & Parker Research, found:

– Local hire goals are on track;

– There was no change in project cost between PSA and non-PSA projects;

– The number of bidders is lower (an average of six per project), but with no impact on cost or quality;

– PSA projects are on average completing faster than non-PSA projects.

“The results prove that the school board made the right decision in approving this agreement,” said Richard Barrera, Board President. “It’s good for our students and teachers and good for our local economy by providing jobs for local workers.”

The report finds that overall construction costs have not been affected by the agreement. School Board Member Scott Barnett, who represents Subdistrict C, said he is convinced that the agreement has had a positive impact.

“I admit I was highly skeptical of the PSA,” said Barnett, a former head of the San Diego County Taxpayers Association who joined the school board after approval of the agreement. “That’s why I pushed for an independent review of the Prop. S projects by a trusted source.”

At Barnett’s suggestion SDUSD retained Rea & Parker Research, who completed many studies for the San Diego Taxpayers Association.

“The facts are clear, the PSA is good for taxpayers,” said Barnett.

On November 4, 2008, nearly 69 percent of San Diego voters passed the $2.1 billion general-obligation bond measure, Proposition S to repair, renovate and revitalize our neighborhood schools.

The Project Stabilization Agreement is designed to ensure a sufficient supply of skilled craft workers and to eliminate work disruptions on Prop. S projects. It also includes sections that promote the hiring of skilled craftspeople living within the San Diego Unified boundaries and encourages individuals living within district boundaries, including students, to become apprentices.

The following are highlights from the Rea & Parker Research Report.

– There has been no increase in the cost of the winning bids for school construction projects under the San Diego Unified School District (SDUSD) Project Stabilization Agreement (PSA) than were the winning bids for non-PSA projects under Proposition S that was approved in November, 2008.

– The number of general contractor bidders and participating subcontractors per project has declined for PSA projects; however, this decline is not reflected in any increase in cost to SDUSD.

– Profit margins for contractors have declined under the PSA, but these contractors appear to be absorbing these increased costs rather than increasing their bids—thereby imposing no additional cost upon SDUSD taxpayers.

– Project completion time is faster under the PSA than for Proposition S projects that pre-dated the PSA. Faster completion allows for the District to experience less overhead per project and for the more efficient replacement school improvements to be in operation more quickly.

– Quality of construction, as indicated by contractor and construction manager interviews and by survey responses, is unchanged between projects constructed under the PSA and those that were contracted prior to the PSA.

– Workers from targeted zip codes (economically disadvantaged portions of the District) have increased during the past six months and are presently close to achieving the very ambitious target of 35 percent that was set in the PSA.

– The achievement of the high level of workers from targeted zip codes is due predominantly to union referrals that are focused upon obtaining workers from these zip codes. This increase in targeted area workers is not re-flected among non-union core workers or existing workers for union signatory contractors.

– There has been an increase in reporting violations and deficiencies pertaining to labor compliance since the PSA was adopted; however, there is no discernible or perceived impact on construction quality or duration of construction caused by these deficiencies. Furthermore, it can be interpreted that this increase is due to increased attention to worker payroll and benefits under the PSA than before, which is beneficial to the payment of prevailing wages to the working population.

– The Los Angeles Unified School District PSA required approximately 5 years to achieve operational efficiency. SDUSD’s PSA has been in effect for only 2 years and, by the measures included in this report, is significantly ahead of the LAUSD schedule.

SEJ 2012 Application Link

By | December 6, 2011 |

To submit your application, please save this word document to your hard drive and then fill it out. The link to the word document is below. Then email the document as an attachment, along with your essay answers, one letter of recommendation, and your resume to sej@onlinecpi.org.

 

CPI calls on SD County board to optimize use of new federal health funding

By | November 30, 2011 |

Research shows more people uninsured in county, while outreach lags

As residents of San Diego County continue to lose health insurance, County officials could enhance their efforts to bring in federal funding newly available to increase coverage.

The Center on Policy Initiatives is calling on the County Board to re-examine its approach to the federal Affordable Care Act, in light of new research findings:

  • Employment-based insurance is declining, leaving an additional 27,000 San Diego County residents uninsured in 2010, and pushing many thousands more into public, taxpayer-funded programs such as Medi-Cal and Healthy Families, CPI reports in The Uninsured in San Diego County.

“Counties are responsible for providing a healthcare safety net,” said Corinne Wilson, CPI research and policy lead. “The federal government is offering funding to strengthen those safety nets, and that gives the San Diego County Board an opportunity to benefit taxpayers as well as individuals who’ve fallen on hard times.”

As the Union-Tribune reported this week, the County has limited early enrollment in the new Low Income Health Program, instead transferring participants in from another program it opted to close. Because the closed program had broader eligibility standards, the change by the County will leave more people uninsured in the future.

Under the federal Affordable Care Act, which will be fully implemented by 2014, an estimated 203,000 more county residents could be eligible for Medi-Cal and others qualify for additional public programs. However, decisions on eligibility standards and allocating matching funds are left up to county governments.

CPI urges San Diego County officials to gather input from a wide variety of community stakeholders on the best way to respond to the federal healthcare reform opportunities, for the good of community residents as well as healthcare providers such as hospitals and clinics.

Issues: , , | Campaigns: | Research: , ,

CPI needs YOU now!

By | November 15, 2011 |

The real cost of Wall Street’s reckless practices

By | Published in San Diego Union-Tribune | November 6, 2011 |

As “Occupy Wall Street” protests continue in San Diego and other cities across the nation, it is important to bear in mind the real costs of Wall Street’s recklessness on our communities. Almost 50,000 homes have been foreclosed in the city of San Diego since the start of the mortgage financial crisis in 2008. And new data released last month by DataQuick suggest that this number is continuing to grow at an alarming rate. These foreclosures, as documented in a recent report from the San Diego-based Center on Policy Initiatives and the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, have imposed significant and uncompensated costs on families and communities, well and above the financial losses faced by banks.

Much policy attention has been given to the impacts of this crisis on Wall Street – including mortgage lenders and investors in mortgage-backed securities who have received the lion’s share of federal bailouts. In that context, the financial and emotional losses to homeowners have often been minimized, if not justified, by narratives of fraud and irresponsibility. But when homes are lost to foreclosure, the entire community suffers: homeowners and their families, as well as neighbors, local governments, schools and businesses.

As foreclosed homes lose almost a fourth of their monetary value, surrounding properties follow suit, decimating home equity across neighborhoods. CPI and ACCE estimate that, in the past five years, almost $20 billion in property values have been lost in the city of San Diego alone. Because home equity is the major – if not the only – form of wealth held by average American families, this decline in property value has substantial negative effects on the resources available for retirement, education, medical care and other expenses.

Contrary to popular belief, renters are not shielded from these downward trends. When property values and expenditure decline, unemployment and underemployment increase, cutting across the entire population. In addition, as the tax base is eroded, local tax revenues decline, making it difficult for local governments to address mounting needs. Abandoned foreclosed properties alone impose significant costs to the city in the form of maintenance, inspections and public safety monitoring. Combined with the loss of property tax revenues, these costs add up to almost $1 billion. The resulting fiscal pressures challenge the ability of local government agencies to provide basic services like parks, libraries, fire and police.

Unlike financial institutions, cities and families have not been protected from the reckless decisions of mortgage companies, banks and investors. Policy change at the federal level is slow to come and has had practically no impact in the low-income and minority communities where foreclosures are concentrated and their impacts most severe. Today, the costs associated with predatory lending and other reckless financial practices of Wall Street are being felt throughout the region. Financial institutions responsible for foreclosed properties must be held accountable. Our City Council can do its part to protect our communities by supporting the Property Value Protection Ordinance, which would require banks holding foreclosed properties to register the properties with the city, and puts in place fines that penalize those failing to register and maintain their properties.

This is a straightforward and pragmatic way of holding Wall Street accountable to our communities.

Joassart-Marcelli is an economic geographer at San Diego State University.

Issues: | Campaigns: | Research:

Will a new law solve problem of foreclosure blight in San Diego?

By | November 4, 2011 |

San Diego City Beat reporter Kelly Davis points to CPI’s Foreclosure Report in an examination of community advocates’ search for a solution to foreclosure blight. Read the article »

Celebrating workers’ strides in 2011

By | November 3, 2011 |

There’s reason to celebrate!  So we threw a party. See pictures and videos from our 2011 Gala here →.

100s of San Diego workers organized this year to ensure their voices were heard. CPI honors them in this video, which debuted at the gala.